ArticleRevista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
Work-related accidents involving venomous animals in Brazil (2019 2023): associated factors and health inequalities among workers.
Article in Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In Brazil, accidents involving venomous animals represent a significant health problem, affecting particularly vulnerable populations. Objectives: To analyze the factors associated with work-related accidents involving venomous animals in Brazil between 2019 and 2023. Methods: A cross-sectional study using secondary data from the Notifiable Diseases Information System, including sociodemographic variables, accident characteristics, and clinical manifestations. The analysis comprised absolute and relative frequencies, prevalence ratios (PR) with 95% confidence intervals, and robust Poisson regression for the multivariate model. Multicollinearity was assessed using the Variance Inflation Factor, and discriminatory ability was evaluated with the ROC curve. Results: Of the 1,442,464 reported cases of accidents involving venomous animals, 1,280,223 had valid data regarding work-relatedness; among these, 122,608 (9.58%) were classified as work-related. The mean age of victims was 36.5 years (SD = 21.0). Factors statistically associated with the outcome included: male sex (PR=2.66), black/brown race (PR=1.08), yellow/indigenous race (PR=1.24), illiteracy (PR=1.11), accidents involving snakes (PR=2.27), spiders (PR=1.19), and other animals (PR=1.18), as well as injuries to upper limbs (PR=1.23) and head (PR=1.12). The model showed an area under the ROC curve of 72.56% and a variance inflation factors average of 2.15, indicating good discriminatory capacity and absence of multicollinearity. Conclusions: Work-related accidents involving venomous animals predominantly affect vulnerable populations, reflecting social inequalities and gaps in worker health protection. The importance of preventive strategies expanded access to healthcare, and active surveillance in the territories-especially rural areas-is emphasized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.