Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41777156›Full record

ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2026

Ngalaiya Boorai Gabara Budbut: A Qualitative Study With Primary Care Providers to Understand Perceived Needs, Enablers, Barriers and Opportunities to Strengthen Care.

Christianna Digenis, Rachel Reilly, Peter Azzopardi, Hilina Winkenweder, Odette Pearson, Kane Ellis, Jane Fisher, Debra J Rickwood, Choong-Siew Yong, Ngiare Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christianna DigenisWardliparingga Aboriginal Health Equity, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Rachel ReillyWardliparingga Aboriginal Health Equity, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Peter AzzopardiWardliparingga Aboriginal Health Equity, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9280-6997
Hilina WinkenwederWardliparingga Aboriginal Health Equity, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Odette PearsonWardliparingga Aboriginal Health Equity, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Kane EllisIllawarra Aboriginal Medical Service, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Jane FisherMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Debra J RickwoodUniversity of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4227-0231
Choong-Siew YongNorthern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ngiare BrownWardliparingga Aboriginal Health Equity, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

Ian Potter Foundation 22055National Health and Medical Research Council APP1201471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore primary care providers' perspectives on (i) healthcare needs and barriers to care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and adolescents; and (ii) enablers and opportunities to strengthen care. STUDY

designA qualitative study; interviews and open-ended survey responses.

settingPrimary care providers who work with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children and young people in health and education settings in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. Data were collected between 23 March 2022 and 13 October 2023.

main outcome measuresSixteen interviews and 33 open-ended survey responses were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis with a hybrid inductive/deductive approach.

resultsParticipants reported that some of the most important health needs for children and young people related to mental health. They recognised that the presenting complaint was not always the underlying or only concern, demonstrated an understanding of trauma-informed care and acknowledged the importance of collaborative services that engaged support networks. Barriers to care included a lack of cultural safety in mainstream services, challenging social circumstances, financial concerns, being unaware of available services and privacy and confidentiality concerns. To improve care, staff identified several areas needing change including having a package of services tailored for young people; additional training for providers in child and adolescent health, particularly for mental healthcare, trauma-informed care and communication with young people; providing a safe and engaging environment; support for staff self-care; and additional resources.

conclusionsSupporting mental health needs is a key aspect of caring for children and adolescents. To provide optimal primary healthcare, service providers require specialist skills. To support adolescents and children, participants identified a need for ongoing training, professional development and organisational support to ensure best practice care is sustained. This work has informed the development of training and other resources for partner health services.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services, IndigenousHealth Services Needs and DemandPrimary Health CareAccess to Primary CareAdolescentAustralian Capital TerritoryChildFemaleHumansNew South WalesQualitative Researchadolescenceprimary health caresocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID41777156
PMCPMC12958009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.