ArticleDevelopmental science2026
Non-Symbolic Magnitude Processing Is a Strong Correlate of Symbolic Math Skills in Children From Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- International perspectives on gaps and solutions for integrating research evidence into classroom practices.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to understand and compare non-symbolic (e.g., dot arrays) and symbolic (e.g., Arabic numerals) magnitudes is a critical foundation for learning math. A meta-analysis has revealed that symbolic magnitude processing is a stronger predictor of math performance than non-symbolic, but the evidence base is restricted almost entirely to countries in the Minority World. It is unclear how the strength of the associations between symbolic and non-symbolic magnitude processing and math performance varies across contexts. An examination of cross-national similarities and differences in foundational numeracy skills is sorely needed. In the present study, we examine the predictive nature of symbolic and non-symbolic magnitude processing in school-aged children from Ghana (n = 350) and Côte d'Ivoire (CIV; n = 342), two West African countries in the Majority World. Contrary to prior studies from countries in the Minority World, we found that non-symbolic magnitude processing was a significant and unique predictor of math performance in 5- to 13-year-olds from Ghana. The strong association remains significant when controlling for symbolic magnitude processing, literacy, executive functioning, and socioemotional skills. A second preregistered study with participants from Côte d'Ivoire revealed the same pattern of results. These associations diverged from those that have been found in the Minority World and underscore the importance of taking a global perspective for understanding the cognitive precursors for math development. The data also highlight the potential use of the Numeracy Screener to measure children's understanding of numerical magnitude in classrooms around the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.