ArticleDevelopmental science2026
The Development of Temporal Memory for Complex Events.
Article in Developmental science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Remembering when past events occurred is a key component of episodic memory, yet its developmental trajectory remains only partially understood. This study examined how children aged 6 and 10, compared to young adults, recall the timing of events embedded in an 11-min cartoon. After viewing the cartoon, participants estimated the time of occurrence of short clips extracted from the narrative by placing them on a visual analogue scale representing the episode's duration. They also completed a number line task to assess visuospatial magnitude representation and a chronological reordering task (adapted from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children III), to evaluate narrative chronological organization. Results revealed a clear age-related improvement in temporal precision. Older children showed almost adult-like performance and exhibited less bias than younger children. Crucially, differences in visuospatial skills did not fully account for this developmental trend, as controlling for number line and reordering performance did not eliminate age-related effects. Additionally, only older children showed improved timing estimates for clips rated as more important, indicating the emerging role of narrative structure as a mnemonic scaffold during the school years. Correlational analyses further suggest a developmental shift from spatial to more abstract, narrative-based representations of time. These findings highlight primary school years as a crucial window for the development of temporal memory in naturalistic contexts and suggest a gradual progression from perceptual to conceptual time representations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.