GuidelineObstetrics & gynecology science2026
Consensus-based guideline of the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology for high-risk human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening.
Guideline in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) is an important cause of cervical cancer. hrHPV testing has emerged as an effective screening modality to address the limitations of cytology-based screening. However, in Korea, the absence of standardized clinical guidance has resulted in variability in practice. This consensus-based clinical practice guideline was developed by a multidisciplinary expert committee under the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and includes specialists in gynecologic oncology, pathology, laboratory medicine, and public health. Relevant domestic and international evidence was systematically reviewed and perspectives from diverse clinical settings were incorporated through four public hearings. The final recommendations were established through expert consensus. These guidelines present four key recommendations. First, hrHPV testing may be considered for women aged ≥25 years, with a screening interval of 3 to <5 years. Second, screening assays should differentiate between HPV genotypes 16 and 18 while detecting other high-risk types, and tests with established clinical validity are recommended. Third, hrHPV testing should be performed in appropriately equipped settings, following standardized procedures for specimen handling and reporting, with clear documentation of HPV 16/18 status in positive cases. Fourth, the testing should operate under rigorous internal and external quality control systems to ensure reliability and consistency. These guidelines aim to promote consistent and evidence-based implementation of hrHPV testing for cervical cancer screening in Korea, supporting early detection and prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.