ArticleThe Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry2026
Australia's Better Access initiative: A survey of provider and referrer views.
Article in The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Who uses Better Access treatment services? A re-analysis of data from the usual care arms of two randomised controlled trials.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Accessibility and responsiveness of Better Access treatment services: Insights from the use of linked administrative data in the evaluation of Better Access.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Examining the effectiveness of the Better Access initiative using data from real-world practice settings.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Australia's Better Access initiative: An overview.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026Review
- A virtual consultative forum on future reforms to Better Access.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Consumers' experiences with and outcomes from Better Access: Results from a national survey.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAustralia's Better Access initiative enables people with mental disorders to be referred for treatment and management through a range of providers. The costs to consumers are offset by Medicare rebates. We examined eligible providers' and referrers' views and experiences with Better Access.
methodAn anonymous online survey was completed by 2386 participants: 572 clinical psychologists, 1140 psychologists, 398 social workers, 104 occupational therapists, 45 general practitioners and 126 psychiatrists. The survey included questions about processes, outcomes, barriers and facilitators associated with Better Access.
resultsMost survey participants (54-99% depending on professional group) had provided Better Access services in 2021. The majority believed Better Access enables them to deliver care that is appropriate, tailored to consumers' needs and achieves good outcomes. However, there were concerns that consumers who require more intensive or linked-up care might not receive adequate care through Better Access. Many providers, particularly allied health professionals, did not have the capacity to take on new consumers, leading to long waiting lists and delayed treatment. High out-of-pocket costs (a flow-on effect of inadequate rebates) were seen as discouraging engagement by consumers on low incomes. Good communication between referrers and providers was seen as a key facilitator of Better Access care, but complicated referral and review processes were identified as impeding communication and disrupting continuity of care for consumers.
conclusionProviders and referrers agreed that Better Access achieves good outcomes for consumers. Strategies to address workforce capacity and affordability for consumers, and to streamline referral and review processes are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.