ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Emotional valence through pupil: Machine learning classification under controlled visual complexity and emotional arousal in young adults.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pupillometry has long been proposed as a noninvasive physiological measure for emotional valence. However, its empirical effectiveness remains inconclusive due to confounding visual and emotional factors. This study examined whether pupil response patterns alone can reliably distinguish between positive and negative emotional stimuli while explicitly controlling for visual complexity (spatial frequency; SF) and emotional arousal at three standardized levels. Fifty images (25 positive and 25 negative) were presented, and pupil responses were recorded. Dynamic time warping-based clustering captured temporal variations and similarities in pupil size responses across visual conditions. Initial classification without controlling SF and arousal yielded near-chance accuracy (~57%) despite luminance control. However, performance improved substantially when stimuli were segmented by specific arousal-SF combinations. Under a representative low arousal, high spatial-frequency condition (SF level 4), the best-performing configuration (logistic regression) achieved a mean classification accuracy of approximately 79% and an AUC of 0.88, with consistently high precision, recall, and specificity across cross-validation folds. Feature importance analyses highlighted critical pupillary parameters, including the area under the pupil dilation curve, as key predictors. These results suggest that pupillary responses can reliably indicate emotional valence under rigorously controlled visual conditions, emphasizing control of perceptual and emotional factors in pupillometry-based emotion research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.