Trial reportPhysiological reports2026
Impact of cold air exposure on respiratory physiology during light-to-moderate physical activity in healthy adults.
Trial report in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Working in cold environments presents unique physiological challenges, and this study sought to investigate the specific impacts of cold air exposure on ventilation during light-to-moderate physical activity simulating occupational work demands. Fourteen healthy adults (3 females; age: 24 ± 6 years) completed five 20-min treadmill walking bouts across three environmental conditions (20°C, 10°C, and 0°C) in a randomized, crossover design. Respiratory variables, including minute ventilation (VE), breathing frequency (RR), and tidal volume (Vt), were measured, as well as heart rate (HR) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA. VE was significantly higher at 0°C compared to both 10°C (mean difference [Δ]: +2.08 L·min
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.