Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41776765›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2026

On flexible covariate adjustment under covariate-constrained randomization.

Bingkai Wang, Fan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bingkai WangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9349-2336
Fan LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6183-1893

Funding

Improving the design and statistical analysis of cluster-randomized trials on tropical infectious diseasesR00AI173395 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WANG, BINGKAI · 2024 to 2025
$497k
NIAID NIH HHS R00 AI173395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covariate-constrained randomization is an effective treatment allocation procedure for controlling imbalance across multiple baseline covariates in randomized trials. Motivated by the GroupPMPlus cluster randomized trial, we introduce the asymptotic theory for a broad class of estimators, known as M-estimators, under covariate-constrained randomization. Here, M-estimators refer to estimators obtained by optimizing an objective function, such as a log-likelihood function, and include commonly used methods such as analysis of covariance and linear mixed models. We show that M-estimators remain consistent in this setting but can exhibit non-Gaussian asymptotic distributions depending on the specification. Using examples of common M-estimators, we delineate conditions under which covariate-constrained randomization can be safely ignored in statistical analysis. Our results extend to stratified covariate-constrained randomization and semiparametric efficient estimators based on data-adaptive machine learning methods. We illustrate these theoretical findings using the GroupPMPlus study to evaluate the causal effect of a psychological treatment on mental health outcomes following a disaster.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHumansLikelihood FunctionsMachine LearningRandom AllocationAsymptotic theorycausal inferenceconstrained randomizationcovariate adjustmentmachine learningM-estimation

Identifiers

PMID41776765
PMCPMC12965748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.