ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2026
On flexible covariate adjustment under covariate-constrained randomization.
Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Covariate-constrained randomization is an effective treatment allocation procedure for controlling imbalance across multiple baseline covariates in randomized trials. Motivated by the GroupPMPlus cluster randomized trial, we introduce the asymptotic theory for a broad class of estimators, known as M-estimators, under covariate-constrained randomization. Here, M-estimators refer to estimators obtained by optimizing an objective function, such as a log-likelihood function, and include commonly used methods such as analysis of covariance and linear mixed models. We show that M-estimators remain consistent in this setting but can exhibit non-Gaussian asymptotic distributions depending on the specification. Using examples of common M-estimators, we delineate conditions under which covariate-constrained randomization can be safely ignored in statistical analysis. Our results extend to stratified covariate-constrained randomization and semiparametric efficient estimators based on data-adaptive machine learning methods. We illustrate these theoretical findings using the GroupPMPlus study to evaluate the causal effect of a psychological treatment on mental health outcomes following a disaster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.