SynthesisJournal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
Balloon Dilation for Chronic Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Under Local and General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundThere has been a recent increase in the publication of articles evaluating outcomes of balloon dilation of the eustachian tube (BDET) as a treatment for chronic eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). Our objective was to evaluate the overall efficacy of BDET for treating ETD, with a subgroup analysis of BDET performed under local anesthesia (LA) versus general anesthesia.MethodsPUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for English articles from January 2010 to October 2025. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed. Only randomized controlled trials and prospective studies evaluating BDET for ETD were included. All articles evaluating BDET performed under LA were assessed.ResultsOur search identified a total of 23 articles after screening (365 articles). Only studies using homogeneous and validated outcome measures were included. A total of 6 studies met criteria for meta-analysis of preoperative and postoperative outcomes of BDET as assessed by the ETD Questionnaire (ETDQ-7). Other reported parameters include LA protocols and surgical complications. Seven studies used LA protocols. A meta-analysis using the random effects model demonstrated a decrease in mean ETDQ-7 scores by 2.03 up to a year following BDET (309 patients, CI -2.59 to -1.47,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.