ArticleSystematic reviews2026
Effect of adequate daily water intake versus inadequate water intake on the risk of major chronic diseases in healthy adults: a systematic review protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic diseases (cardiovascular, cancer, respiratory, diabetes and chronic kidney disease) account for over 80% of global mortality and remain a leading public health challenge. Although water intake is essential to physiological function and homeostasis, its role in the long-term prevention of chronic diseases remains underexplored. Current guidelines are vague, inconsistent, and aimed at preventing acute dehydration, without robust evidence supporting benefits for chronic disease prevention. This study outlines a preliminary systematic review designed to synthesise existing literature on plain water intake and chronic disease risk, with the aim of laying the groundwork for future public health recommendations.
methodsThis review will include English-language randomised controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, and cohort studies assessing the relationship between plain water intake and the incidence of chronic diseases in healthy adults. Only studies measuring oral plain water consumption will be included. Adequate water intake is defined as 2 to 3.7 l daily, based on current international and national recommendations. Eligible studies must report on the risk of developing one or more major chronic diseases and provide quantifiable outcomes (e.g. odds ratios, or relative risks with 95% confidence intervals). A meta-analysis will be conducted where appropriate, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses will explore potential sources of heterogeneity. DISCUSSION: This systematic review is the first to collate evidence on the collective relationship between plain water intake and multiple chronic disease outcomes. By adopting a binary classification (adequate versus inadequate intake), this preliminary synthesis aims to generate practical and actionable insights that are accessible to the general public. Recognising the fragmented nature of existing research, the findings will serve as a foundation for future studies to refine thresholds and inform clinical and public health guidelines. Limitations such as self-reported data, residual confounding, exclusion of non-English studies, and variability in intake measurement, will be transparently addressed in the interpretations of results. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO; CRD420251021321. It can be accessed from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251021321 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.