ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2026
Acceptability of screening for substance use among children at Ugandan health facilities.
Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSubstance use among children and adolescents is an emerging public health concern, with studies from some settings reporting substantial levels of alcohol and other substance use among young people. However, in many low- and middle-income countries, including Uganda, the role, feasibility, and implications of routine substance use screening in primary healthcare settings remain poorly understood. Validated tools such as the CRAFFT (Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble) screening instrument have been used in other contexts, but evidence on their acceptability among children, caregivers, and health workers in African primary care settings is limited. This study assessed the acceptability of the CRAFFT tool among children aged 6–17 years, their caregivers, and health workers in primary healthcare settings in Uganda.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 824 children, their caregivers, and 47 health workers across selected health facilities. Acceptability was measured using Likert-scale questionnaires tailored to each participant group; children, caregivers, and health workers alongside open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analyzed using STATA 18, and qualitative feedback was analyzed thematically.
resultsThe CRAFFT screening tool was generally acceptable across all participant groups. Children found the tool easy to understand and informative, caregivers appreciated its potential for early identification of risky behaviors, and health workers viewed it as useful in identification of substance use. However, several concerns were raised, including long screening durations, lack of privacy, cultural and religious sensitivities, and doubts about the relevance of screening younger children.
conclusionCRAFFT screening was found to be acceptable among children, caregivers, and health workers in Ugandan health facilities. However, successful implementation requires addressing key barriers such as confidentiality, time burden, and cultural appropriateness. Integrating screening into routine care, especially in community and school settings, may enhance uptake and early intervention for substance use among children and adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.