Observational studyOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Advancing clinical insight into creatine transporter deficiency: long term outcome and new observations from the Italian cohort.
Observational study in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCreatine Transporter Deficiency (CTD) is a rare X-linked disorder caused by pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the SLC6A8 gene, leading to a deficiency of cerebral Creatine. Clinically, CTD manifests as a complex neurodevelopmental disorder and is associated with Intellectual Disability (ID), language and socio-communicative impairments, behavioral challenges and, often, epilepsy.
methodsThis study was conducted in two phases: (i) An eSurvey was distributed among major Italian clinics specializing in rare neurometabolic diseases to create a national census of CTD patients, with extensive clinical data; (ii) A retrospective observational study was performed on patients who had undergone regular long-term follow-up using a consistent neuropsychological assessment and treatment protocol.
resultsWe identified 18 CTD male patients, aged 18 months to 32 years at diagnosis. Within this cohort, 3 to 13 years follow-up clinical information was collected for 10 patients. A specific clinical protocol was applied to this subgroup, where a biochemical or 1H-MRS diagnosis was confirmed in 8 patients (urine Creatine/Creatinine ratio > 1), while in the remaining 2 patients, genetic testing was diagnostic and neurochemical tests followed. 1H-MRS consistently showed a decreased Creatine peak in all patients. All 10 patients exhibited ID with significant speech disorder, and 6 had epilepsy. The treatment protocol for this cohort involved oral Arginine supplementation.
conclusionsDiagnosing CTD remains clinically challenging due to the often negative results from a first tier clinical diagnostic test for intellectual disability (ID) (i.e. family history, cytogenetic testing and Fragile X) and neuroimaging without spectroscopy. CTD should be carefully considered when investigating severe ID with autistic-like traits and significant speech impairment, with or without epilepsy. The Urine Creatine/Creatinine ratio assay is a quick initial diagnostic step, which can be corroborated by a brain MRI/1H-MRS and molecular genetics. Even considering previouis literature findings, it is not yet possible, to demonstrate definite genotype-phenotype correlations, although a milder functional impairment has been suggested for missense SLC6A8 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. Treatment strategies supplementation with Creatine and its precursors have provided heterogeneous and inconsistent results. Recently proposed innovative therapeutic strategies such as lipophilic Creatine analogs and betaine supplementation in animal models need validation in human disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.