ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
AI-based video analysis for the assessment of upper limb function in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: feasibility of remote monitoring.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate assessment of upper limb function in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (UCP) is essential for clinical decision-making. Although the Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA2) has been widely adopted to achieve this, this method requires substantial evaluator training and lengthy administration times, and is susceptible to inter-rater variability. To address these challenges, we evaluated the feasibility of employing AI-driven automated video analysis to objectively classify the severity of upper limb impairment in pediatric UCP using retrospectively collected MA2 videos captured under realistic, non-standardized clinical conditions.
methodsThis study retrospectively enrolled 19 children with UCP (mean age 5.50 ± 2.03 years; 10 males, nine females) who underwent repeated MA2 assessments, yielding 644 candidate item-videos. After pre-specified quality control, the final analytic set comprised 616 item-videos. We fine-tuned four index-specific Video Vision Transformer (ViViT) models—one per MA2 index—and evaluated them using subject-wise five-fold cross-validation to predict dichotomized severity (mild vs. severe) for range of motion (ROM), accuracy, fluency, and dexterity. Videos were recorded with handheld devices without standardized protocols, reflecting typical clinical practice.
resultsThe AI model demonstrated a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.890, with the highest performance for dexterity (AUC = 0.936), and similarly high performances for ROM (AUC = 0.866), accuracy (AUC = 0.887), and fluency (AUC = 0.869). Item-wise analyses showed that a limited subset of MA2 tasks contributed disproportionately to the correct classification of mild versus severe cases across indices, highlighting the importance of item-level variability when designing automated MA2 assessment protocols.
conclusionsThis preliminary study showed that AI-driven automated video analysis can classify dichotomized MA2-based upper limb impairment severity using routinely acquired, nonstandardized clinical videos of children with UCP. However, further methodological refinement—including standardized recording guidelines, prediction models that extend beyond binary labels to ordinal or item-level MA2 scoring, and prospective validation in larger and more diverse cohorts—is required to confirm clinical applicability and enhance generalizability. Trial registration Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.