ArticleBMC medicine2026
Identification of cryosensitive niches and a targetable FOS/AP‑1 program in the human ovarian cortex by single‑cell and spatial transcriptomics.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Technological Advances of Cryopreservation in Ovarian Tissue for Female Children: Exploring the Molecular Insights and Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe ovary is a vital and dynamic reproductive organ. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) plays a vital role in preserving female fertility. However, the cellular subtypes most susceptible to cryoinjury and the molecular mechanisms underlying cryopreservation-associated damage remain poorly understood. This study aimed to identify cell populations vulnerable to freezing-thawing and to elucidate the key transcriptomic alterations and signaling pathways associated with ovarian cryoinjury at the single-cell and spatial levels.
methodsOvarian cortical tissues from patients undergoing three gender reassignment surgery (GRS) were divided into fresh and vitrification-rapid warming groups. Following collagenase IV digestion, 10x Genomics single-cell RNA-seq was used for dissociated ovarian cell suspensions (27,185 fresh and 25,480 frozen-thawed cells). Eight major cell clusters were identified. Additionally, 110 oocytes (66 fresh, 44 vitrification-rapid warming) were isolated and analyzed using the Smart-seq2 platform. Spatial transcriptomics was performed via BGI Stereo-seq. Molecular validation was performed via β-galactosidase staining, immunofluorescence, and qRT-PCR.
resultsCryopreservation significantly altered the activity of pathways related to focal adhesion, oxidative stress, and apoptosis, particularly in stromal and perivascular cells. The number of FOS-positive perivascular cells was notably increased after vitrification-rapid warming, whereas the number of PTGDS-positive stromal cells decreased. Oocyte analysis revealed that cryopreservation primarily disrupted pathways involved in the cell cycle and meiosis, although the damage was not irreversible, supporting the relative safety of long-term cryostorage. Spatial transcriptomics and functional validation further confirmed the rapid and robust activation of the FOS/AP-1 pathway after vitrification-rapid warming, particularly in perivascular and granulosa cells. Treatment with T-5224 (a FOS/AP-1 inhibitor) significantly rescued the morphology and function of cultured frozen-thawed ovaries.
conclusionsStromal and perivascular cells are the main cell types that are sensitive to ovarian cryopreservation. The FOS/AP-1 pathway is markedly activated after, suggesting the exacerbation of metabolic impairment. In oocytes within the ovarian cortex, the cell cycle and meiosis-related physiological processes were the primary processes affected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.