ArticleReproductive health2026
Scars of birth: caesarean delivery and fertility intentions among women of reproductive age in sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA single multi-country study in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) conducted nearly two decades ago reported that caesarean section (C-section) delivery was associated with reduced subsequent childbearing. To address the gap created by the lack of recent regionally representative evidence that reflects changes in access to surgical delivery, maternal health systems, and fertility-related attitudes, we assessed the association between having ever had a C-section and subsequent fertility outcomes.
methodsThe study used the most recent data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) of 30 countries in SSA conducted between 2013 and 2024 (n = 790,139). The study used two outcome variables: (i) the number of children ever born and (ii) the desire/preference for another child. The independent variable is whether the respondent has ever had a C-section birth. The first analysis applied a negative binomial regression to examine the association between C-section births and the number of children born. The second analysis applied multivariable binary logistic regression to analyse the association between C-section births and the desire to have more children.
resultsThe mean number of children for each woman is 3.60 (95% CI:3.56–3.61). Chad had the highest mean number of children born (4.61, 95% CI:4.56–4.66) whereas Lesotho had the lowest mean number of children born (2.09, 95% CI:2.02–2.16). The results show that women who have ever had a C-section birth are 8% less likely to have more children compared to those who have not had a C-section birth (IRR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.91–0.93). Also, higher levels of education are associated with a lower likelihood of having more children, particularly for those with higher education (IRR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.50–0.52) compared to those with no education.
conclusionThese findings highlight the need for focused and practical interventions to offer counselling to mothers during perioperative, pre-operative, and post-operative periods to enhance understanding of C-section and their potential implications on future fertility. Providing women with clear and practical information during prenatal and antenatal visits can help them better understand the medical reasons for C-sections, as well as the potential risks associated with having many children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.