Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41776526›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2026

Applying participatory systems approaches to enhance child mental health in local communities in Denmark: a process evaluation.

K Ryom, I-M Graversen, H Kirkegaard, S Allender, H T Maindal, P Bentsen, A-L Bjerregaard, J N Østergaard, T L Petersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

K RyomDepartment of Public Health, Health Promotion and Intervention Research, Aarhus University, Bartholins alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. knudryom@ph.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5947-3038
I-M GraversenDepartment of Public Health, Health Promotion and Intervention Research, Aarhus University, Bartholins alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6731-2469
H KirkegaardSteno Diabetes Centre Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6877-916X
S AllenderGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition (GLOBE), Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4842-3294
H T MaindalDepartment of Public Health, Health Promotion and Intervention Research, Aarhus University, Bartholins alle 2, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-7254
P BentsenCopenhagen University Hospital-Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, the Capital Region, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-6779
A-L BjerregaardSteno Diabetes Center, Zealand, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9844-5531
J N ØstergaardSteno Diabetes Centre Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0627-1237
T L PetersenSteno Diabetes Center, Zealand, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3132-9568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGroup model building (GMB) based on systems approaches is increasingly used to facilitate a shared understanding of complex problems, structures and relationships. GMB helps to create consensus on the drivers of problems, identify local opportunities and barriers, and develop context-specific actions. This feasibility study aims to investigate the use of GMB and a participatory systems approach in two small local communities, focusing on process, mechanisms of change and capacity building, before designing a larger trial.

methodA qualitative feasibility evaluation using semi-structured interviews with participants from the two communities, Havndal (six informants) and Moen (five informants), was performed after three GMB workshops. A purposive sampling strategy was used to gain an in-depth perspective on the experience of participating in the GMB process. The informants included, for example, municipal employees, local citizens and schoolteachers. The interviews were conducted 3-6 months after the GMB process, and a thematic analysis was conducted.

resultsThe participants' experience with the GMB process was generally positive. They felt actively engaged and motivated, as the process allowed them to contribute meaningfully to discussions and decisions throughout the process. Their involvement sparked a strong commitment to address child health within their community, and many expressed a sense of ownership over the initiatives that emerged from the workshops. Some participants, however, reported concerns about unequal representation of voices within the communities and the workload associated with the developed initiatives. Most of the participants reported the mechanisms of change initiated by the GMB process as: a common understanding and goal; the identification of unique needs; involvement, ownership, trust and confidence; a common voice; and communication and visibility. Participants also reported that community capacity was built throughout the GMB process.

conclusionsThe process of using GMB and participatory approaches proved to be feasible in the two Danish local communities. Participants had a positive experience, identifying key mechanisms, gaining valuable capacity-building skills, and improving collaboration, which benefited their communities. The integration of these approaches appears to have the potential for scaling up in similar contexts.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingChild HealthCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity ParticipationMental HealthChildDenmarkFeasibility StudiesGroup DynamicsHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchChildhood healthCommunity-based participatory researchEvaluationGroup model buildingMunicipalities

Identifiers

PMID41776526
PMCPMC13064176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.