ArticleHealth research policy and systems2026
Applying participatory systems approaches to enhance child mental health in local communities in Denmark: a process evaluation.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGroup model building (GMB) based on systems approaches is increasingly used to facilitate a shared understanding of complex problems, structures and relationships. GMB helps to create consensus on the drivers of problems, identify local opportunities and barriers, and develop context-specific actions. This feasibility study aims to investigate the use of GMB and a participatory systems approach in two small local communities, focusing on process, mechanisms of change and capacity building, before designing a larger trial.
methodA qualitative feasibility evaluation using semi-structured interviews with participants from the two communities, Havndal (six informants) and Moen (five informants), was performed after three GMB workshops. A purposive sampling strategy was used to gain an in-depth perspective on the experience of participating in the GMB process. The informants included, for example, municipal employees, local citizens and schoolteachers. The interviews were conducted 3-6 months after the GMB process, and a thematic analysis was conducted.
resultsThe participants' experience with the GMB process was generally positive. They felt actively engaged and motivated, as the process allowed them to contribute meaningfully to discussions and decisions throughout the process. Their involvement sparked a strong commitment to address child health within their community, and many expressed a sense of ownership over the initiatives that emerged from the workshops. Some participants, however, reported concerns about unequal representation of voices within the communities and the workload associated with the developed initiatives. Most of the participants reported the mechanisms of change initiated by the GMB process as: a common understanding and goal; the identification of unique needs; involvement, ownership, trust and confidence; a common voice; and communication and visibility. Participants also reported that community capacity was built throughout the GMB process.
conclusionsThe process of using GMB and participatory approaches proved to be feasible in the two Danish local communities. Participants had a positive experience, identifying key mechanisms, gaining valuable capacity-building skills, and improving collaboration, which benefited their communities. The integration of these approaches appears to have the potential for scaling up in similar contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.