SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
A systematic review on how to treat deltoid ligament injuries - are we missing a uniform standard?
Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is an vivid, ongoing discussion on whether injuries to the deltoid ligament complex, especially in the setting of ankle fractures, neccessitate surgical treatment. One reason for the conflicting results in literature, could be a missing standard on how acute deltoid ligament injuries are treated. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the different applied treatment stratagies in studies reporting on the outcome of surgically treated acute deltoid ligament injuries.
methodsThe herein conducted systematic review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines, the inclusion criteria were framed according to the PICOS criteria. The study was a-priori registered. Three independent reviewers conducted the literature search and data extraction (JS, AMN). The data assessed were study type, level of evidence, included fractures, methods of treating deltoid ligament injuries, differentiation between the superficial and deep layers and associated syndesmotic injuries.
resultsPer the therapeutic studies (n = 37), the deltoid ligament repair was mostly conducted using suture anchors (n = 29), either placed in the medial malleolus for superficial deltoid ligament (SDL, n = 11)/ deep deltoid ligament (DDL, n = 7) repair and/ or in the medial talus for DDL repair (n = 10). 10 studies used direct sutures for SDL repair (n = 10) and/ or the DDL repair (n = 1). One study each used either a tibialis anterior tendon graft, a temporary arthrodesis of the ankle joint, or augmented the deltoid ligament.
conclusionA missing standard for treating injuries to the deltoid ligament complex was observed. Although most studies used suture anchors, there is a huge heterogeneity regarding the placement, the number of anchors used for repair, and the exact layer(s) that were adressed. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based guidelines on how to treat acute deltoid ligament injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.