Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41776516›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2026

Translating one health research evidence into action: co-production of rabies control knowledge in Côte d'Ivoire.

Akoko Sita Kondo, Kathrin Heitz-Tokpa, Francis Akindès, Bassirou Bonfoh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Akoko Sita KondoDépartement d'Anthropologie et Sociologie, Université Alassane Ouattara, Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire. akoko.kondo@csrs.ci.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4575-508X
Kathrin Heitz-TokpaCentre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d'Ivoire, 01 BP 1303, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0507-4194
Francis AkindèsDépartement d'Anthropologie et Sociologie, Université Alassane Ouattara, Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire.
Bassirou BonfohCentre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d'Ivoire, 01 BP 1303, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.

Funding

DELTAS Africa Initiative [Afrique One-ASPIRE /DEL-15-008] Wellcome [107753/A/15/Z], and the UK government
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranslating research evidence into practice has become a priority for academics, funders and public institutions worldwide. However, many research projects still lack strategies and funds for policy-related research translation, innovation, dissemination and uptake activities. This study focuses on research evidence on rabies produced by Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d'Ivoire under GAVI's project. It aims to (i) identify the mechanism used by researchers to share evidence with practitioners, policy makers and local communities and to (ii) identify what facilitates research uptake.

methodsA qualitative method was used to gather data from the producers (researchers) and users (policy-makers and community) of research from both the human and animal health sectors, and local community leaders, using semistructured interview guide and observation. Fifteen informants were selected using the snowball sampling technique and purposive selection from the GAVI's project team. The knowledge brokering theory was used to explain the translation of rabies research evidence into practice by understanding what facilitate the research uptake in pratical way. Thematic content analysis was used for the interpretation of data.

resultsThe main mechanisms mobilized to disseminate results were meeting platforms including workshops, trainings, and sensitizations during the annual WRD and written formats such as policy briefs, reports. The research findings lead to change or to have impact on actual practices, as some of the users associated with the research process hold high-ranking positions in human and animal health and this may facilitate research uptake in their sectors. Furthermore, sensitizations of local authorities and communities during the project cycle led to the creation of local intersectoral rabies committees that have had a direct impact on the increase of rabies reporting in the two regions with the highest prevalence of rabies in the country.

conclusionsThis paper highlights different strategies used to disseminate research evidence and shows the enabling factors of research evidence uptake at the policy-makers' level and community level. To achieve the 0 rabies target by 2030, science needs to be more closely involved in policy, through dialogue with other stakeholders such as the media. In this way, stakeholders can make better use of health research evidence to co-construct strategies for improving the fight against rabies.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationOne HealthRabiesTranslational Research, BiomedicalAdministrative PersonnelAnimalsCote d'IvoireEvidence-Based MedicineHealth PolicyHumansQualitative ResearchRabies VaccinesResearch PersonnelRabies VaccinesCôte d’IvoireKnowledge brokersRabies controlResearch evidenceTransdisciplinaryTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID41776516
PMCPMC13063450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.