ArticleBMC public health2026
Prevalence and associated factors of individuals at risk for obstructive sleep apnea in urban, stock-raising, and agricultural Xinjiang, Northwest China, a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe present study aims to investigate the prevalence and related factors of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), population at risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), in urban, stock-raising and agricultural dwellers from Xinjiang, Northwest China.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, participants aged ≥ 18 years were recruited in Emin, China in 2019. Participants underwent questionnaire assessments, including the No-SAS questionnaire (which incorporates neck circumference, obesity, snoring, age, and sex), and details in medical history and lifestyle.
resultsData for 32,916 participants were analyzed with an average age of (47.3 ± 14.2) years. The overall prevalence of SDB was 24.6%, and was 29.1%, 18.6% and 22.9%, respectively in participants from urban, stock-raising and agricultural regions were (P < 0.001), consistent in different gender and in the young. In logistic regression analysis, common associated factors for SDB presence were cigarette and alcohol consumption, abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, and presence of hypertension, coronary heart diseases and of stroke for total and region-specific participants.
conclusionsSDB is very common in urban, stock-raising and agricultural local population, who share most of the cardio-metabolic associated factors for SDB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.