Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41776499›Full record

Observational studyBMC medicine2026

Vericiguat for endothelial dysfunction and CRT response in non-responders: the VERCET prospective observational study.

Celestino Sardu, Ludovica Vittoria Marfella, Luca Rinaldi, Ferdinando Carlo Sasso, Domenico Cozzolino, Francesco Nappo, Ausilia Sellitto, Ciro Romano, Caterina Carusone, Nunzia D'Onofrio and 13 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Celestino SarduDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy. drsarducele@gmail.com.
Ludovica Vittoria MarfellaDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Luca RinaldiDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Ferdinando Carlo SassoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Domenico CozzolinoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Francesco NappoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Ausilia SellittoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Ciro RomanoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Caterina CarusoneDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Nunzia D'OnofrioDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Maria Consiglia TrottaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Joshua RiccioDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Domenico CioffiDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Mario VolpicelliDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Santa Maria Della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Naples, Italy.
Carmine La MarcaDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Santa Maria Della Pietà Hospital, Nola, Naples, Italy.
Natale MarrazzoDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Responsible Research Hospital, Campobasso, Italy.
Valerio GiordanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, San Luca Hospital, Vallo Della Lucania, Italy.
Carlo FumagalliDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Alessandro LandolfiDepartment of Neuro-Cardiological Sciences, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy.
Marianna AbitabileDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Lorenza MarfellaDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.
Maria Luisa BalestrieriPollution and Cardiovascular Diseases Research Centre, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Raffaele MarfellaDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, 80138, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndothelial dysfunction (ED) is a negative prognostic factor for patients with heart failure (HF) who are treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). ED could lead to CRT non-responders by increasing endothelin-1 (ET-1) expression and inflammatory/oxidative stress markers. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Vericiguat is an anti-HF medication that may reduce inflammatory/oxidative stress, ET-1 expression, and improve endothelial function in ED-CRT non-responders, leading to better outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a prospective observational study enrolling ED-CRT non-responders treated with vericiguat (vericiguat users) versus those who did not receive vericiguat (non-vericiguat users). ED was diagnosed by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD ≤ 7.1%) of the brachial artery. Clinical, echocardiographic, and biochemical assessments (inflammatory markers and ET-1) were performed at baseline and at 12 months. The primary endpoints were normalization of endothelial function (FMD > 7.1%) and CRT response at 1 year. Secondary endpoints included changes in inflammatory/oxidative stress markers, ET-1 levels, and clinical outcomes (HF hospitalizations, cardiac, and all-cause mortality).

resultsA total of 289 ED-CRT non-responders were included, of whom 81 received vericiguat (vericiguat users) and 208 did not receive vericiguat (nonusers). At 1-year follow-up, vericiguat users vs. non-users demonstrated significant improvement in New York Heart Association class, 6-min walking test, and left ventricular remodeling (p < 0.05). Vericiguat users vs. non-users showed a significant reduction in inflammatory/oxidative stress biomarkers, B-type natriuretic peptide, and ET-1 (p < 0.05). At the end of follow-up, a lower rate of vericiguat users versus nonusers was under treatment with loop diuretics, aldosterone blockers, and sodium-glucose-transporter 2 inhibitors (p < 0.05). At follow-up end, a higher rate of vericiguat users vs. nonusers showed normalization of endothelial function (30 (37%) vs. 21 (10.1%), p < 0.05) and restored CRT responders (28 (34.6%) vs. 27 (13%), p < 0.05). At 1-year follow-up, the normalization of endothelial function was predicted by left-ventricle ejection fraction (0.42, CI 95% [0.02-0.72]) and vericiguat (4.35, CI 95% [2.45-7.70]). The CRT responders' outcome was predicted by vericiguat therapy (2.85, 95% CI [1.67-4.89]).

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that vericiguat reduces ED and enhances the response to CRT in prior non-responders by significantly lowering inflammatory/oxidative stress markers and ET-1.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyEndothelium, VascularHeart FailurePyrimidinesAgedBiomarkersEndothelin-1FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxidative StressProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersEndothelin-1PyrimidinesCRT non-respondersEndothelial dysfunctionET-1Vericiguat

Identifiers

PMID41776499
PMCPMC13063640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.