Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41776493›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

What do the general public believe about back pain? A scoping review of population-based studies.

Jeremy R Chang, Chris G Maher, Sweekriti Sharma, Gemma Altinger, Aidan Van Wyk, Arnold Yl Wong, Rachelle Buchbinder, Florian Bailly, Hazel Jenkins, Adrian C Traeger

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeremy R ChangSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. rui.chang@connect.polyu.hk.
Chris G MaherSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sweekriti SharmaSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Gemma AltingerSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Aidan Van WykSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Arnold Yl WongDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Rachelle BuchbinderMusculoskeletal Health and Wiser Health Care Units, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Florian BaillyInserm UMR S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'épidémiologie et de santé publique, Sorbonne université, Paris, France.
Hazel JenkinsDepartment of Chiropractic, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Adrian C TraegerSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Misconceptions about back pain are reported to be common among the general public. We aimed to identify evidence and gaps regarding the general public’s beliefs about back pain from population-based studies across the world. We systematically searched CINAHL, CENTRAL, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from inception until September 9, 2024 to identify population-based studies that quantitatively assessed beliefs about back pain. Twelve studies involving 22,903 participants from Australasia, Europe, North America, and the United Kingdom were included. These studies utilised five questionnaires and 27 study-specific statements to assess beliefs. Included studies investigated 90 discrete belief statements. A substantial proportion of the general public hold incorrect beliefs including that most back pain is caused by specific conditions or injuries (47.3%–58.5%), back pain rarely resolves (39.8%–74.2%), rest is helpful for recovery (20.4%–76.5%), staying active is unsafe or unhelpful (13.4%–71.1%), healthcare is always needed (53.7%–84.8%), imaging is usually informative (44.6%–70.6%), and simple painkillers are usually insufficient (67.4%–76.1%). Research investigating population-level beliefs about back pain has to date been restricted to high-income countries. Most included studies focused on beliefs about imaging and self-care, with limited attention to contemporary issues such as unsafe or unproven care and indicators to seek healthcare for back pain. Given the potential for incorrect beliefs to worsen outcomes for back pain, our findings underscore the need for improved measurement tools, tailored interventions, and policies that consider widespread misconceptions.

Indexed as

Back PainHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePublic OpinionHumansBack painBeliefsMeasurement toolsScoping review

Identifiers

PMID41776493
PMCPMC13064184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.