ArticleBMC cancer2026
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) enumeration and machine-learning based diagnostic biomarkers for breast cancer detection.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) are detectable in early-stage cancer and may enable early cancer detection. We evaluated a CTC-based assay as a complementary biomarker for breast cancer detection in an Asian population with a high prevalence of dense breast tissue.
methodsIn this single-center, prospective, blinded study, peripheral blood from Taiwanese women with breast cancer and healthy controls was analyzed using a CTC-enumeration platform (CMx) based on biomarker expression (cytokeratin 18 [CK18], mammaglobin [MGB], CD45), cell morphometry, and nuclear features. A machine-learning model integrating CTC biomarkers with age, white blood cell (WBC) count, and platelet count was developed to assess classification performance, providing proof-of-concept for combining CTC-derived and routine blood parameters in breast cancer risk assessment.
resultsA total of 228 breast cancer patients and 170 healthy controls were included. Age and CK18- and MGB-positive CTC counts differed significantly between groups, whereas WBC and platelet counts did not. An ensemble linear support vector machines model incorporating age and CTC features achieved an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-0.96) in the independent test cohort, with high sensitivity (0.93), positive predictive value (0.74), and negative predictive value (0.86), but modest specificity (0.57). In the exploratory BI-RADS 3/4 subgroup, the model identified all cancer cases (sensitivity 1.00), with a specificity of 0.44 and overall accuracy of 0.79.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of combining CTC enumeration with machine learning for breast cancer detection and supports the need for future large-scale, multicenter, multiethnic prospective external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.