ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2026
Abnormal imaging features of episodic cluster headache and episodic migraine: a multimodal 7T MRI study.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- White matter microstructural alterations in episodic cluster headache outside attacks: a tract-based spatial statistics study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study was to identify functional and structural alterations that differentiate cluster headache (CH) from migraine and address their aberrant imaging features to distinguish from healthy controls.
methodsClinical and MRI data were obtained from 87 CH patients, 166 migraineurs (26 with aura and 140 without aura) and 115 healthy controls using a 7T MR system. Between-group differences in the resting-state functional MRI, DTI and T1-weighted structural images were analyzed. Furthermore, the correlation between imaging features and clinical characteristics were explored.
resultsIndependent component analysis showed that, compared to controls, CH patients presented decreased fluctuation within auditory network, whereas migraineurs presented decreased fluctuation within default mode network and lateral visual network, and increased fluctuation within salience network (FDR corrected p < 0.05). In comparison with controls, both CH patients and migraineurs had increased connectivity between medial visual network and lateral visual network, and CH patients also had increased connectivity between visual network and somatomotor network (MAFDR corrected p < 0.05). Consistent with inter-network findings, functional connectivity analysis based on anatomical atlas revealed that both CH patients and migraineurs had increased connectivity between brain areas mediating sensory-motor and perceptual information processing. Compared to migraineurs, CH patients had increased functional connectivity among limbic brain regions (FDR corrected p < 0.05). Structural connectivity analysis found that CH patients had increased fiber number between right lentiform nucleus and right cerebellum, and generally decreased fiber number among cerebellar regions (FDR corrected p < 0.05). The vertex-wise analysis showed that CH patients presented reduced cortical thickness in clusters located in the left pericalcarine and right lateraloccipital, compared to both controls and migraineurs (Monte-Carlo cluster corrected p < 0.05). In CH patients, attack duration was negatively correlated with the functional connectivity between medial visual network and lateral visual network, as well as functional connectivity between right calcarine gyrus and right fusiform gyrus. In headache patients, cortical thickness in the left pericalcarine was positively correlated with attack duration and negatively correlated with NRS score (the absolute value of r > 0.2 and p < 0.05).
conclusionsGenerally increased functional connectivity, including between functional networks and between anatomical brain regions, is shared by CH patients and migraineurs. The increased functional connectivity among limbic brain regions and reduced cortical thickness in associated areas may differentiate CH from migraine, potentially reflecting their distinct nociceptive mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.