ReviewNPJ cardiovascular health2024
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a clinically oriented narrative review.
Review in NPJ cardiovascular health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Left Main Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in a Young Woman With Migraine and Triptan Use.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Contemporary PCI in SCAD and the Role of Intravascular Imaging.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- From Challenges to Solutions: Patient Insights Inform Psychological Intervention Design After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Clinical Decision-Making and Imaging-Guided Follow-Up Strategies in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Article
- Case Report: Recurrent spontaneous coronary artery dissection involving the left main.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: dissecting an underdiagnosed problem.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025Review
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Women.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Exploration of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, and Clinical Implications.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Unraveling Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in Sudden Cardiac Death: Integrating Pathology, Genetics, and Molecular Autopsy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD): Unveiling the Enigma of the Unexpected Coronary Event.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Unveiled: Pathophysiology, Imaging, and Evolving Management Strategies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Narrative Review of Epidemiology and Public Health Implications.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), with a higher incidence in younger female patients. It is also associated with pregnancy, delivery, and the post-partum period. Despite an exponential rise in the volume of SCAD-focused research and publications within the past decade, SCAD is still a poorly understood condition, with a paucity of randomised controlled trial data. This review discusses the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of SCAD alongside areas for future research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.