ReviewNPJ cardiovascular health2024
Acute Type A aortic dissection surgical repair in Octogenarians: A meta-analysis.
Review in NPJ cardiovascular health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Outcomes After Total Arch Replacement With Frozen Elephant Trunk in Elderly Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2026Article
- Advancing global cardiovascular research and clinical translation.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based analysis of factors influencing surgical duration in type A aortic dissection.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic dissection (AD), a life-threatening condition resulting from aortic wall tears, is especially concerning in the elderly. However, few studies have investigated long-term surgical outcomes in octogenarians with Type A aortic dissection (TAAD). Our paper addresses this critical knowledge gap. Four electronic databases were searched from inception till November 2022 to include any observational or randomized controlled trials (RCT) that evaluate long-term surgical outcomes of TAAD in octogenarians alone or compared with Septuagint focusing on factors including surgical approach, comorbidities, and preoperative status. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool study estimates and calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We included 18,057 participants (10,253 males, 7804 females). In octogenarians and compared to medical treatment, surgical repair achieved significantly lower rates of re-exploration (9%), antegrade cerebral perfusion (33%), stroke (10%), and respiratory failure (19%). In terms of operative data, octogenarians had shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (161.89 min), cross-clamp time (103.18 min), and myocardial ischemic time (90.89 min). Compared to septuagenarians, octogenarians had significantly shorter cardiopulmonary bypass and systemic cardiac arrest times (-13.84 min and -2.46 min, respectively). Additionally, octogenarians had a higher risk of respiratory complications (RR = 1.60). No significant differences were found for tracheostomy, antegrade cerebral perfusion, neurologic complications, and renal failure. In conclusion, octogenarians undergoing surgical repair for TAAD face relatively lower complication rates, but a higher risk of respiratory issues compared to septuagenarians, emphasizing the unique surgical challenges in this elderly fragile population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.