ArticleScientific reports2026
Multicenter ex vivo evaluation of an α-mannosidase-targeted fluorescent probe for intraoperative margin assessment in breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining an accurate intraoperative margin is essential in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer. This multicenter study assessed the diagnostic potential of a novel fluorescent probe targeting α-mannosidase, named the α-Man probe, in evaluating intraoperative margins. We analyzed 274 resected breast tissue samples, including malignant and benign lesions, across four institutions. Fluorescence intensity (FI) was measured 5 and 20 min following the application of the α-Man probe. Receiver operating characteristic analysis defined definitive thresholds for changes in FI (ΔFI), maintaining false positive and false negative rates at ≤ 3%. Diagnostic performance was also compared with a γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT)-based fluorescent probe that we previously developed. Using 5-min ΔFI thresholds, positive, uncertain, and negative classifications were 24.1, 53.6, and 22.3%, respectively. At 20 min, these classifications improved to 28.1, 38.3, and 33.6%, respectively. At 5 and 20 min, positive predictive values were 93.9% and 94.8%, whereas negative predictive values were 95.1% and 96.7%, respectively. Compared with the GGT probe, α-Man substantially reduced the uncertain classification rate while maintaining high predictive accuracy. This study demonstrated that a two-step ΔFI-based protocol using the α-Man probe enables the accurate, real-time, and pathologist-independent assessment of resected specimens, supporting its future application to intraoperative margin evaluation during BCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.