ArticleScientific reports2026
Proof-of-concept thermoelectrically cooled sow-cooling mat.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heat stress reduces the welfare and performance of late-gestation and lactating sows as well as the performance of their litters. Current cooling methods have shortcomings in alleviating sow heat stress. An innovative, stand-alone, thermoelectrically cooled sow-cooling mat (SCM) that does not require an external cool water source was designed, fabricated, and tested. Water circulating beneath the aluminum tread plate to remove the sow’s heat, was cooled in a heat exchanger comprising Peltier modules, heat sinks, and fans. In two farrowing room trials comparing one sow with an SCM to a control sow with no mat, the SCM’s gross cooling capacities in Trials 1 (late-summer) and 2 (mid-summer) were 395 W and 366 W, while coefficient of performance (COP) values were 3.6 and 3.2, respectively. While lack of replicates precluded drawing conclusions regarding the SCM’s impact on sow and litter performance, some performance metrics (e.g., sow weight change (Trial 2), feed intake (Trial 2), and mean final weaned piglet weight were positive. However, the SCM’s impact on sow welfare was unclear. In an environmental chamber, with two 85-W heating pads, mat center temperatures were reduced by 5 °C and 11.7 °C in Tests 1 (baseline scenario) and 2 (bottom insulated), respectively. Final cooling capacities in Tests 1 and 2 were 146 W and 161 W, respectively, while corresponding COP values were 1.3 and 1.5. The SCM’s impact on sow and litter welfare and performance should be evaluated in a larger replicated study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.