ArticleScientific reports2026
Gene driven analytical learning model for accurate breast cancer diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients diagnosed with breast cancer exhibit a diverse range of prognostic outcomes due to the varied nature of the disease across different patient groups. To address this complexity and enhance prognostic predictions based on gene expression data from breast cancer samples, this study has developed an integrated deep learning method that combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) networks. This automated pipeline conducts a correlation analysis using Pearson correlation to derive a reliable 236-gene set, ensuring no data contamination from patient samples.Furthermore, patterns of gene-gene interactions based on correlations were examined to provide further evidence of the biological relevance of the gene set that was selected. The training and validation of the proposed model utilized data from The Cancer Genome Atlas-Breast Cancer (TCGA-BRCA) and was assessed using the METABRIC dataset to enhance generalization capabilities. Experimental results indicate that the Full Hybrid (CNN BiLSTM) model significantly outperforms other machine learning and deep learning approaches. Notably, while the BiLSTM-only model achieved an optimal Recall of 0.9319, the hybrid model demonstrated a substantially higher Recall of 0.9943, accompanied by an impressive ROC AUC of 0.9955 and an F1 score of 0.9962. Furthermore, the proposed framework has been statistically validated, achieving a minimal variance of 0.000083 even under conditions of up to 20% noise perturbation. Optimization of this framework was conducted using the Optuna Bayesian Optimization methodology on a dual NVIDIA Tesla T4 array configuration. Overall, this article presents a universal computational tool for precision medicine in breast cancer, designed to yield consistent results across diverse patient scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.