ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantitative ex vivo assessment of target temperature and ablation duration for protocol optimization of microwave ablation procedures with mr thermometry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To quantitatively assess the influence of target temperature and ablation duration on the quality of proton resonance frequency shift (PRFS)-based MR thermometry during microwave ablation (MWA) in a controlled ex vivo model, and to identify parameter ranges associated with improved thermometry performance. Thirty-two MWAs were performed in 10 ex vivo bovine livers in a 1.5-tesla MRI system with multi-slice volumetric real-time thermometry yielding temperature and thermal dose maps. The experiments were conducted twice using all combinations of four target temperatures (60; 80; 100; 120 °C) and four ablation times (5:00; 7:30; 10:00; 15:00 min). Thermometry quality was rated on a 5‑point Likert scale. Ablation areas were compared with histopathology (hematoxylin and eosin, H&E; and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, NADH‑diaphorase) and correlated using Spearman coefficients. Likert scores were compared across temperatures using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. All evaluations were performed independently by two readers. Lesion areas varied from 2.6 to 12.9 cm², increasing primarily with target temperature. Ablation areas from temperature and thermal dose maps correlated strongly with macroscopically visual necrosis (p < 0.01). Likert scores differed significantly across temperatures (p < 0.05). The highest image quality was achieved at 60 °C for 7:30 min, showing comparable scores as at 80° for 15:00 min, but significantly differing from 100 °C to 120 °C. In this controlled ex vivo setting, lower target temperatures were associated with improved MRI thermometry quality, providing more reliable visualization of ablation zones; however, ablation volumes decreased at lower temperatures. Furthermore, these empirical ex vivo observations suggest that a staged two-level approach may support a clinical workflow strategy aimed at balancing thermometry image quality and ablation volume. Given the absence of perfusion and motion effects, these findings require further validation before clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.