ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2026
Impact of PSA- versus STN-DBS on effective connectivity in Parkinson's disease - a 3.0T resting-state fMRI study.
Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Brain Stimulation of the Posterior Subthalamic Area and the Subthalamic Nucleus in Tremor-Dominant Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized, Crossover Trial.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) is an established treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), whereas the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) has been proposed as an alternative target for tremor-dominant cases. However, their underlying therapeutic mechanisms have not been directly compared. Leveraging the single-trajectory dual-target DBS technique, this work utilizes high-field 3.0 T resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data and spectral dynamic causal modeling to investigate the differential modulatory effects of PSA and STN stimulation on effective connectivity within both cortico-basal ganglia and cerebello-thalamo-cortical networks. We show that both PSA and STN stimulation suppress cortico-cerebellar connectivity and cortico-subthalamic hyperdirect connectivity, while enhancing STN self-inhibition. Compared with STN stimulation, PSA stimulation provides a greater reduction in cortico-cerebellar coupling but a greater increase in striato-STN connectivity. Moreover, changes in hyperdirect pathway coupling correlate with motor improvement in response to both PSA and STN stimulation. Furthermore, hyperdirect pathway and cerebellar connectivity were significantly associated with motor impairment and resting tremor severity, respectively, regardless of hemisphere or DBS target. Taken together, these findings suggest that PSA and STN stimulation share common network-level mechanisms but differ in their relative modulation of cortico-cerebellar pathway. The present study may offer theoretical guidance for future individualized DBS targeting in treating tremor-dominant PD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.