ArticleNature communications2026
Contrast-free identification of glioma blood-brain barrier status via generative diffusion AI and non-contrast MRI.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-contrast MRI, routinely used for the preoperative diagnosis of glioma tumors and establishing treatment strategies, provides the potential for assessing blood-brain barrier (BBB) status without using gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) which could cause adverse events. Additionally, generative artificial intelligence (AI) models enable the synthesis of contrast-enhanced images from non-contrast images. Despite this potential, the heterogeneity of GBCA-induced features in tumor areas and error accumulation from inaccurate synthesis largely limit the efficacy of conventional generative models. To address these limitations, we introduce a contrast-free BBB status identification model (CBSI) that can identify BBB status with high accuracy using non-contrast MR images and generative diffusion AI networks. Trained and validated on a multi-center dataset of 1,535 patients, CBSI achieves an area under the curve (AUC) of 81.31%, surpassing the performance of the model using only non-contrast MR (AUC = 72.76%) and demonstrating comparable performance to the T1Gd MR model (AUC = 88.68%) in an external test set. Furthermore, validation on two public datasets (BraTS-Africa and BraTS-GLI) supports the generalizability of CBSI in BBB status identification. Notably, with accurate BBB status of synthetic T1Gd, the performance of glioma segmentation and grading is improved significantly compared to existing methods. Generalizability analysis indicates that CBSI can facilitate BBB status identification using synthetic T1Gd findings, avoiding GBCA adverse effects and streamlining clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.