Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41776115›Full record

ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2026

[Relative scotoma rethought-Comparison between rapid campimetry and standard automated perimetry].

Friedrich Hoffmann, Thilo Knacke, Fabian Müller, Christian Meltendorf

Abstract readComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Friedrich HoffmannKlinik für Augenheilkunde, im Ruhestand, Charité, Universitätsmedizin, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland. fhoffman@zedat.fu-berlin.de.
Thilo KnackeUpstream CFD GmbH, 10625, Berlin, Deutschland.
Fabian MüllerH & M Medical Solutions GmbH, 14195, Berlin, Deutschland.
Christian MeltendorfFachbereich Elektrotechnik - Mechatronik - Optometrie, Berliner Hochschule für Technik, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual field test of rapid campimetry offers a new perspective on relative scotomas. When passing through a relative scotoma at a speed of 6°/s, the bright test point flickers. With a reduced test dot size from GIII to GII and a reduced running speed of 0.75°/s, a rapid change from no light perception (absolute scotoma proportion 72%) to light perception (proportion 28%) is observed in the relative scotoma. The relative scotoma appears to consist of a juxtaposition of intact nerve fibers and multiple mini-Bjerrum scotomas.

Indexed as

ScotomaVisual Field TestsHumansSensitivity and SpecificityVisual FieldsBjerrum scotomaGlaucomaRapid campimetryRelative scotomaStandard Automated Perimetry (SAP)

Identifiers

PMID41776115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.