Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41776066›Full record

ArticleCarbon balance and management2026

How do forest types regulate soil organic carbon quantity and quality in southeastern Xizang? Evidence from soil organic carbon and the carbon pool management index.

Jiahua Han, Chao Wang, Xiyue Meng, Jie Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiahua HanSchool of Ecology and Environment, Xizang University, Lhasa, 850000, China.
Chao WangInstitute of Xizang Plateau Ecology, Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi Xizang, 860000, China.
Xiyue MengInstitute of Xizang Plateau Ecology, Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi Xizang, 860000, China.
Jie LuInstitute of Xizang Plateau Ecology, Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi Xizang, 860000, China. tibetlj@163.com.

Funding

Graduate High-Level Talent Training Program of Xizang University 2025-GSP-B009Science and Technology Project of Xizang Autonomous Region of China XZ202501JD0020Talent Team Construction Project of Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University XZNMXYRCXM-2024-05Xizang Agricultural and Animal Husbandry University Doctoral Program in Forestry (Phase I) funded by Grant 533325001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The forest soil carbon pool is a core component of the terrestrial carbon cycle, and its quantity and quality are largely regulated by forest types, thereby influencing the carbon sequestration capacity of forest ecosystems. The Qinghai-Xizang Plateau is one of the regions most sensitive to global climate change, experiencing warming rates higher than the global average and pronounced ecological vulnerability. Among its subregions, southeastern Xizang is characterized by extensive forest cover and prominent ecological functions. Accordingly, elucidating the differentiation characteristics and driving mechanisms of soil carbon pool quantity and quality among different forest types in this region is of great significance for accurately evaluating regional carbon sink capacity. This study focused on multiple representative forest types in southeastern Xizang, including coniferous forests, broad-leaved forests, and conifer-broadleaf mixed forests, to systematically compare the distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon (SOC) and its fractions among different forest stands, and to explore the variation patterns and driving factors of the carbon pool management index (CPMI). The results showed significant differences in soil organic carbon and its fractions among forest types in southeastern Xizang (p < 0.05). The Cupressus gigantea forest exhibited consistently higher levels of soil organic carbon and its fractions, indicating a strong carbon accumulation capacity, whereas both Pinus densata forest and Pinus yunnanensis-Populus davidiana mixed forest showed relatively lower values overall. The carbon pool management index varied markedly among forest types. The Cupressus gigantea forest showed the highest carbon pool index (CPI) and carbon pool management index (CPMI) (p < 0.05), indicating the best soil carbon pool quality. Driving factor analysis revealed that soil organic carbon (SOC) and carbon pool index (CPI) were primarily regulated by available nitrogen (AN), available potassium (AK), electrical conductivity (EC), and soil water content (WC). The carbon pool management index (CPMI) was mainly driven by field capacity (FC) and total nitrogen (TN), whereas carbon pool activity (A) and the carbon pool activity index (AI) were more dependent on available phosphorus (AP) and total phosphorus (TP). Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that the first two ordination axes together explained 92.8% of the total variation, with the first axis accounting for 88.1% and the second axis for 4.7%, indicating that environmental factors can effectively explain the variation in soil carbon pool quantity and quality. This study revealed the spatial differentiation patterns and distinct driving mechanisms of soil carbon pool quantity and quality in alpine forests, providing a scientific basis for evaluating forest carbon pool quality and guiding regional carbon sequestration enhancement and management.

Indexed as

Carbon pool management indexCarbon sinkDriving factorsForest type

Identifiers

PMID41776066
PMCPMC13067535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.