ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Morning vs. afternoon saliva: limited diurnal variation in ion composition of unstimulated whole saliva.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSaliva is increasingly recognized as a valuable diagnostic fluid due to its non-invasive collection and wide range of biochemical markers. However, the potential influence of the circadian rhythm on salivary composition remains a concern, e.g. in clinical diagnostics. This study aimed to determine whether the time of collection—morning (9:00–11:00) versus afternoon (13:00–15:00)—significantly affects ion concentrations in unstimulated whole saliva (UWS). MATERIALS AND
methodsSaliva samples from 30 healthy adults were analyzed for flow rate. Next, cortisol (as a reference marker for the circadian rhythm) and nine salivary ions were quantified using ELISA and capillary electrophoresis, respectively.
resultsNo significant differences were found in flow rate or cortisol levels between the two timepoints. Most ion concentrations, namely sodium, potassium, chloride, phosphate, sulphate, ammonium, and nitrate, also remained stable. In contrast, calcium and magnesium showed significant, opposing shifts: calcium was higher in the afternoon, while magnesium was higher in the morning.
conclusionThese findings suggest that, with some exceptions, salivary ion concentrations are largely unaffected by collection time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This supports the flexible use of UWS for diagnostic purposes without strict timing constraints, increasing its applicability in clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.