Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41776048›Full record

ArticleNPJ cardiovascular health2026

Interpretable multimodal zero shot ECG diagnosis via structured clinical knowledge alignment.

Jialu Tang, Hung Manh Pham, Ignace De Lathauwer, Henk S Schipper, Yuan Lu, Dong Ma, Aaqib Saeed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ cardiovascular health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Foundation models for cardiovascular diseases and medicine.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jialu TangDepartment of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. j.tang@tue.nl.
Hung Manh PhamSchool of Computing and Information Systems, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore.
Ignace De LathauwerDepartment of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Henk S SchipperDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Yuan LuDepartment of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Dong MaSchool of Computing and Information Systems, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore.
Aaqib SaeedDepartment of Industrial Design, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation is essential for cardiovascular disease diagnosis, but current automated systems often struggle with transparency and generalization to unseen conditions. To address this, we introduce ZETA, a zero-shot multimodal framework designed for interpretable ECG diagnosis aligned with clinical workflows. ZETA uniquely compares ECG signals against structured positive and negative clinical observations, which are curated through an LLM-assisted, expert-validated process, thereby mimicking differential diagnosis. Our approach leverages a pre-trained multimodal model to align ECG and text embeddings without disease-specific fine-tuning. Empirical evaluations demonstrate ZETA's competitive zero-shot classification performance and, importantly, provide qualitative and quantitative evidence of enhanced interpretability, grounding predictions in specific, clinically relevant positive and negative diagnostic features. ZETA underscores the potential of aligning ECG analysis with structured clinical knowledge for building more transparent, generalizable, and trustworthy AI diagnostic systems.

Identifiers

PMID41776048
PMCPMC12912381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.