ArticleEmergency radiology2026
CT evaluation of traumatic diaphragmatic injury: a large retrospective cohort study of blunt and penetrating trauma.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Diagnostic pitfalls and laparoscopic repair of a delayed large right-sided traumatic diaphragmatic hernia.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement of CT signs for traumatic diaphragmatic injury (TDI) in a large surgically confirmed cohort, stratified by blunt and penetrating mechanisms.
methodsThis retrospective study included 106 patients with surgically confirmed TDI (38 blunt, 68 penetrating) who underwent preoperative multidetector CT between 2010 and 2022 at a level 1 trauma center. A matched control group comprised 107 patients with surgically confirmed intact diaphragms. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed randomized CT examinations, assessing predefined direct and indirect signs: diaphragm discontinuity, intrathoracic herniation, focal thickening, dependent viscera, collar sign, and trajectory of injury (penetrating only). Interobserver agreement was measured with kappa statistics, and logistic regression identified independent predictors of TDI.
resultsIn blunt trauma, diaphragm discontinuity and intrathoracic herniation were the most sensitive signs (65–77%). In penetrating trauma, the trajectory sign demonstrated the highest sensitivity (89–91%), followed by diaphragm discontinuity and focal thickening (39–61%). Radiologists’ overall impression yielded sensitivities of 76–82% for blunt and 82–87% for penetrating trauma. Interobserver agreement was substantial (κ = 0.61–0.80).
conclusionDiaphragm discontinuity and intrathoracic herniation are key predictors of blunt TDI, whereas trajectory and focal thickening are most predictive in penetrating trauma. Recognition of mechanism-specific CT predictors may improve timely diagnosis and reduce morbidity from delayed repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41775998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.