ArticleNpj biological timing and sleep2025
Introduction of novel objects to the home cage of mice repeatedly disturbs sleep for seven days with minimal stress induction.
Article in Npj biological timing and sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Not All Sleep Loss Is Equal: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Rodent Models, Their Neurobiological Validity, and Translational Relevance to Neurological Disease.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Synergistic Impact of Sleep Disturbance and Social Isolation in Adult but Not Adolescent Female Mice.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- At the Intersection of Pain and Sleep: a Roadmap for Preclinical Pain Research.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of low sleep quality is a significant issue, particularly among adolescents, necessitating a deeper understanding of its biological consequences. In sleep research, various protocols are used for sleep deprivation or disturbance, each presenting its own set of confounding factors crucial to consider. We developed a standardized seven-day sleep disturbance protocol using daily four-hour exposures to novel objects to minimize mouse stress. Objects were selected and characterized for their wake-promoting properties, and exposure timing was structured to reduce variability and enhance experimental reliability and reproducibility. During the four hours of sleep disturbance, the mice were efficiently sleep-deprived during each exposure. Thus, the selected objects efficiently kept the mice awake also after seven days exposure. On the first day of sleep disturbance, the protocol induced a sleep deprivation effect when measured over 24 h (hours), but by the seventh day, the mice recovered the sleep loss over the 24 h. Thus, this method induces an acute sleep loss, but over days it induces a sleep disturbance and not a full sleep deprivation. Fecal corticosterone concentrations remained unchanged during the seven days of sleep disturbances, suggesting that voluntary wakefulness is not stressful. Importantly, we show that the mice compensate for their sleep loss during the week of sleep disturbance, highlighting the need for better validation of long-term sleep deprivation protocols in the sleep field to accurately separate sleep deprivation from sleep disturbance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.