ArticleDiscover oncology2026
Integrative machine learning models reveal immune and metabolic signatures predictive of colorectal cancer prognosis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe progression of colorectal cancer (CRC) is profoundly shaped by immune and metabolic dysregulation within the tumor microenvironment (TME). This study aimed to develop an immune–metabolism-related gene (IMRG)-based prognostic model and experimentally validate its key molecular drivers.
methodsTranscriptomic and clinical data from the TCGA and GEO cohorts were analyzed to identify differentially expressed IMRGs. Molecular subtypes were defined using non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) clustering, and a machine learning–based prognostic model integrating 101 algorithmic combinations was constructed and validated. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), immune infiltration profiling, and drug sensitivity analyses were performed to elucidate biological and immunological differences. IL20RB, identified as a hub IMRG, was further validated through qRT–PCR, Western blotting, and IHC. Its functional role was assessed using CCK-8, wound-healing, and Transwell assays.
resultsNMF clustering revealed two distinct molecular subtypes of CRC with divergent survival outcomes and immune characteristics. The 4-gene IMRG-based model demonstrated robust prognostic performance (C-index = 0.657) and was externally validated in a GEO cohort (AUC up to 0.824 for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival). GSEA showed that the high-risk group was enriched for complement/coagulation cascades and extracellular matrix remodeling, whereas the low-risk group was enriched for metabolic programs including butanoate metabolism and the TCA cycle. Immune profiling indicated increased CD8⁺ T-cell infiltration in the high-risk group and a distinct immune checkpoint landscape, with most checkpoints elevated in the low-risk group, while ADORA2A, TNFRSF25 and CD276 were relatively higher in the high-risk group. Experimental analyses confirmed that IL20RB was significantly upregulated in CRC tissues and cell lines, and its silencing markedly inhibited CRC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, consistent with its predicted oncogenic role.
conclusionThis integrative transcriptomic and computational analysis combined with machine learning and experimental validation identified IMRGs—particularly IL20RB—as critical mediators of CRC progression. The proposed IMRG-based prognostic model offers a robust framework for patient risk stratification, immune landscape characterization, and therapeutic targeting in CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.