ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Periprosthetic humeral fractures: practical guide for treatment : Classification, challenges and contemporary treatment strategies].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeriprosthetic humeral fractures are becoming an increasingly more relevant complication due to the growing number of shoulder arthroplasties being performed. The management of these fractures is complex and influenced by multiple factors.
objectiveThis article provides a structured overview of current classification systems, discusses therapeutic challenges and outlines contemporary treatment strategies for periprosthetic humeral fractures.
methodsA narrative literature review was conducted focusing on the etiology, classification and treatment options of periprosthetic humeral fractures. Particular attention is given to the classification systems of Wright and Cofield and the classification system of Sanchez-Sotelo PF with an emphasis on their relevance to surgical decision making.
resultsThe management of periprosthetic humeral fractures requires an individualized approach. Nondisplaced fractures with a stable implant can be treated conservatively, whereas displaced fractures or those associated with implant loosening typically necessitate surgical intervention. Surgical options include open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), revision arthroplasty and, in selected cases, the use of custom-made implants. Early mobilization combined with interdisciplinary management is critical to achieving favorable functional outcomes. DISCUSSION: Periprosthetic humeral fractures continue to represent a demanding complication in shoulder surgery. A comprehensive understanding of classification systems and modern treatment strategies is essential for accurate treatment planning and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41775894What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.