ArticleNPJ cardiovascular health2024
Optimal facial regions for remote heart rate measurement during physical and cognitive activities.
Article in NPJ cardiovascular health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- When is rPPG physiologically valid for stress and workload monitoring? A PRISMA-ScR scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- EPI-Sense: an integrated hemodynamic sensing and analysis system for early pressure injury warning.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Lighting effects on optimal facial regions for remote heart rate measurement.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Article
- Roadmap of remote photoplethysmography from heart rate measurement toward clinical translation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Adaptive physiology-informed correction for reliable remote photoplethysmography heart-rate monitoring.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Balancing cardiac privacy with quality in video recordings.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Demographic bias in public remote photoplethysmography datasets.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The role of face regions in remote photoplethysmography for contactless heart rate monitoring.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) has gained prominence as a non-contact and real-time technology for heart rate monitoring. A critical factor in rPPG's accuracy is the selection of regions of interest (ROI), as it can significantly influence prediction outcomes. Most studies typically use the forehead and cheeks as ROIs, but little research has explored other facial regions or how stable these ROIs are during physical movement and cognitive tasks. In this study, we analyzed 28 facial regions based on anatomical definitions using two mixed datasets derived from three public databases: LGI-PPGI, UBFC-rPPG, and UBFC-Phys. We applied rPPG algorithms such as orthogonal matrix image transformation (OMIT), plane-orthogonal-to-skin (POS), chrominance-based (CHROM), and local group invariance (LGI). Our findings show that the glabella, medial forehead, lateral forehead, malars, and upper nasal dorsum consistently perform well, with the glabella achieving the highest overall evaluation score. These results offer valuable insights for advancing remote heart rate monitoring technologies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.