ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Development and multicenter validation of an explainable machine learning diagnostic criteria for pediatric abdominal sepsis.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Pediatric Sepsis: Machine Learning Development and Multicenter Validation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate identification of early pediatric abdominal sepsis (PAS) is essential to improving outcomes, yet most existing pediatric sepsis criteria and scoring tools primarily focus on cardiopulmonary dysfunction and overlook early intra-abdominal infections. To address this gap, we combined the real-world data with explainable machine learning to develop the Abdominal Sepsis Diagnosis model (ABSeD) for clinical decision support. The model construction used the retrospective data from 6566 pediatric patients who were admitted to the Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from 2019 to 2023. Prospective data from 308 recruited patients across seven independent hospitals collected between January and March 2025 served as an external validation cohort. PAS status was determined through consensus or by reviewing laparoscopic surgery records. Multiple machine learning algorithms were compared, and the optimal model was further refined by hyper-parameter tuning. The ABSeD model, integrating nine routine clinical variables, demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy (training set: AUC = 0.934, 95% CI: [0.912, 0.950]; accuracy = 0.870, precision = 0.910), and robust multicenter generalizability (AUC = 0.928, 95% CI: [0.895, 0.961]; accuracy = 0.873, precision = 0.924). This model offers an explainable and practical digital tool for early detection of PAS, with potential to enhance timely intervention in hospitalized children with suspected or clinically identified intra-abdominal septic pathology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.