Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41775834›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Intelligent monitoring and CNN-based performance evaluation of borehole-pipe-pump gas drainage systems in coal mines.

Yunlei Tong, Yang Yang, Jiayan Niu, Fengyang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yunlei TongXin Barag Right Banner Rongda Mining Co., Ltd., Hulunbuir, 021300, China.
Yang YangXin Barag Right Banner Rongda Mining Co., Ltd., Hulunbuir, 021300, China.
Jiayan NiuSchool of Safety Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150022, China. Jiayan2022802221@163.com.
Fengyang YangSchool of Safety Engineering, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin, 150022, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient gas drainage is crucial for safe coal mine production and the clean utilization of gas resources. Despite recent advances, complex geological conditions and unstable system operation limit the effectiveness of traditional monitoring in underground borehole-pipe-pump systems. This study conducts controlled experiments to analyze the operational behavior of the gas drainage network under various leakage scenarios, quantitatively revealing characteristic patterns in negative pressure and flow rate. Based on these insights, an intelligent gas-drainage performance evaluation model using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is developed to automate classification of drainage effectiveness. Experimental results using 10,000 samples from Xinfa Coal Mine show that the CNN model achieves optimal performance with a learning rate of 0.1 and batch size of 256, reaching classification accuracies of 100% for Classes I-III, 93% for Class IV, and 50% for Class V. The proposed approach integrates experimental simulation, leakage characterization, and deep-learning-based evaluation into a unified framework, providing an effective solution for real-time monitoring and intelligent assessment of gas drainage systems. This study offers technical support for improving gas extraction efficiency, enhancing mine safety, and promoting the clean and efficient utilization of coal-mine gas.

Indexed as

Borehole-pipe-pump systemConvolutional neural network (CNN)Gas drainageIntelligent evaluationLeakage analysisOperational monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41775834
PMCPMC13065814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.