Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41775824›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Slope stability prediction via TrAdaBoost transfer learning: integrating physics and data into a double-driven framework.

Min Ren, Xinpeng Xu, Feng Dai, Longqiang Han, Chao Wang, Qin Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Min RenFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, China.
Xinpeng XuFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, China.
Feng DaiFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, China. typhoondf@kust.edu.cn.
Longqiang HanFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, China.
Chao WangFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, China.
Qin MengFaculty of Land Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52304132National Natural Science Foundation of China 52404123Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects 202401CF070096Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects 202401CF070115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slope stability prediction is a crucial aspect of landslide disaster prevention and control. Traditional methods are physics-based or data-driven, which are limited by their respective reliance on geotechnical engineering expertise and scarce real-world slope data. This study developed a slope stability prediction model that integrates physics and data through an innovative transfer learning (PD-TL) framework. Four TrAdaBoost transfer learning models were developed using Support Vector Classification (SVC), Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF) as base learners. At the data level, the finite element analysis cases significantly expanded the sample size to resolve issues with data scarcity and model performance limited by sample size. At the model level, most traditional data-driven methods assume that training and test datasets follow the same distribution; in contrast, the proposed model relaxes this assumption and thus offers a promising solution to the scarcity of training data. At the knowledge level, the model incorporates geotechnical engineering expertise to enhance performance by leveraging field-specific insights and principles. Among the TrAdaBoost (-SVC, LR, DT, RF) models tested, TrAdaBoost-SVC showed superior slope stability prediction performance (ACC = 0.878, Precision = 0.794, Recall = 0.931, F1 = 0.857, AUC = 0.928, TNR = 84%). Its superiority demonstrates the value of integrating physics and data into a double-driven framework, which outperforms traditional data-driven and ensemble learning methods. The results also may represent suggestions for future slope stability analysis and broader engineering applications.

Indexed as

Double-drivenSlope stability predictionTrAdaBoostTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41775824
PMCPMC13066611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.