ArticleScientific reports2026
Computational study of novel scandium and lithium perovskites based materials for sustainable energy devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current first-principles density functional theory (DFT) study explores how anionic affects substitution structural, electronic, thermodynamic, mechanical, and optical features of lead-free halide-based double perovskite K2ScLiX6 (X = F, Cl). Both materials are crystallized in a stable cubic structure that has lattice constants of 8.29 Å (X = F) (and 10.13 Å (X = Cl), both confirmed by tolerance factors of 0.97 and 0.93 and negative formation energies. Direct band gaps of 6.34 eV and 3.78 eV are reported as calculated by the electronic structure of K2ScLiF6 and K2ScLiCl6, respectively. Mechanically, fluoride material is stiffer and ductile (B = 41.41 GPa, E = 57.77 GPa, B/G = 1.82), while the chloride is softer and brittle (B = 21.28 GPa, E = 33.32 GPa, B/G = 1.58). Thermally, K2ScLiF6 displays superior stability ([Formula: see text]=389 K, Tm = 913 K), whereas K2ScLiCl6’s lower Debye temperature (θD = 270 K) suggests low thermal conductivity. The K2ScLiX6 (X = F, Cl) compounds are ideal for devices requiring high power and high voltage capabilities due to their ability to withstand higher energy levels without breaking down. The diverse optical responses, including high UV absorption and a strong plasmon peak at 16.40 eV for the chloride, designate K2ScLiF6 for deep-UV applications and K2ScLiCl6 for UV shielding and thermoelectric.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.