ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi task learning based early prediction model for antibiotic resistance using multi institutional cohort data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Bioengineering Approaches for Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance poses a significant global health challenge, with its rapid emergence driven by inappropriate antibiotic use. This study aimed to develop and compare machine learning models to predict resistance to nine antibiotic classes in hospitalized patients, addressing the high-cost labeling challenge of medical data. We conducted a retrospective study using electronic medical records from three Korean tertiary care institutions (n = 59,551). Single-task learning models (Logistic Regression, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, Multi-Layer Perceptron) and multi-task learning models (Hard Parameter Sharing, Soft Parameter Sharing) were developed. Model performance was evaluated using Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC), Precision-Recall Curve (PRC), and calibration slope. In external validation, the hard parameter sharing model achieved the highest AUC and PRC for five of nine antibiotic classes, with average values of 79.63 and 80.26, respectively. Shapley Additive Explanations analysis revealed previous antibiotic resistance as the most important predictor. Subgroup analyses showed hard parameter sharing model performed best with available previous culture test results, while soft parameter sharing excelled when they were missing. Our multi-task learning approach achieved generalized, stable, and superior performance in predicting antibiotic resistance compared with traditional models, providing a novel solution for handling partial targets in medical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.