Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41775792›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Assessment of toothbrushing, bleaching pen and bleaching mouthwash in removing stains from tooth structure and single-shade resin composite.

Tamer M Hamdy, Zeinab M Zaki, Rasha M Abdelraouf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tamer M HamdyRestorative and Dental Materials Department, Oral and Dental Research Institute, National Research Centre (NRC), Dokki, Giza, 12622, Egypt. tm.hamdy@nrc.sci.eg.
Zeinab M ZakiRestorative and Dental Materials Department, Oral and Dental Research Institute, National Research Centre (NRC), Dokki, Giza, 12622, Egypt.
Rasha M AbdelraoufBiomaterials Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, 11553, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of bleaching pen and bleaching mouthwash to remove coffee stains from teeth surfaces and single-shade resin composite restorations by assessing their Vita Classic shades, changes in the Shade Guide Units (ΔSGU) and color differences (∆E00). In addition, a control group subjected to simulated toothbrushing with non-whitening toothpaste was included for comparison. Class V cavities were prepared in the labial surfaces of 30 extracted sound anterior teeth and restored with single-shade resin composite. The restored teeth were immersed in coffee at 37 °C for 12 days. The stained restored teeth were randomly distributed into three groups (n = 10): Group 1: teeth subjected to simulated toothbrushing with non-whitening toothpaste for one week (control), while groups 2 and 3 were divided according to the bleaching system applied for one week as follows: Group 2: bleaching pen and Group 3: bleaching mouthwash. Using a spectrophotometer (Vita Easy Shade V, Germany), the color was measured before and after coffee staining as well as after toothbrushing or bleaching in each tooth at the middle 1/3 (tooth surface) and cervical 1/3 (restoration). The assessment was performed in two approaches: (a) Vita Classic shades which were used to calculate ΔSGU (b) Color parameters which were utilized to assess the color difference (ΔE00). After coffee staining, the color changes were higher in the teeth surfaces (ΔSGU = 7 and ΔE00=23.8) than restorations (ΔSGU = 4 and ΔE00=8.3). These color changes were unacceptable in both the teeth and resin composite restorations (exceeding the acceptability threshold; ΔE00=1.8). The effect of toothbrushing in removing coffee stains was significantly lower than the bleaching pen and the bleaching mouthwash in both resin composite restorations and teeth (least ΔE00, P = 0.0001). After toothbrushing, the shade of the stained restorations did not change than that after coffee (ΔSGU = 0), while the shade of the stained teeth became slight lighter but still darker than the baseline. After applying the bleaching pen or the bleaching mouthwash, the color returned to the baseline in both the restorations and teeth (ΔSGU = 0). Using the ΔE00 to compare the stain removal potentials of both bleaching pen and bleaching mouthwash, there were no significant differences between them in both resin composite restorations and teeth at cervical and middle one-thirds (P = 0.1 and 0.2, respectively). Toothbrushing with non-whitening toothpaste partially reduced coffee stains, but not completely. In contrast, bleaching pens and bleaching mouthwashes effectively removed coffee discoloration from both teeth and single-shade resin composite. Color changes could be assessed using the Vita Classic shade guide unit differences (ΔSGU) and color difference (ΔE₀₀).

Indexed as

Composite ResinsMouthwashesTooth BleachingTooth Bleaching AgentsToothbrushingTooth DiscolorationCoffeeColorHumansSpectrophotometryCoffeeComposite ResinsMouthwashesTooth Bleaching AgentsBleaching mouthwashBleaching penCoffee stainingColor changesShade guide units (SGU) and color difference (∆E00)Single shade resin compositeToothbrushingVita easy shade spectrophotometer

Identifiers

PMID41775792
PMCPMC12957380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.