ArticleScientific data2026
A standardized personality lexicon for enhancing personalized human-machine interaction.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Personality, as a stable and coherent set of behavioral and cognitive patterns, significantly influences linguistic expression, emotional regulation, and cognitive functioning. The Big Five personality traits-neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness- are especially relevant for understanding to language use and social interaction, making them foundational for developing of personality-informed natural language processing (NLP) systems. Despite this, existing personality lexicons often lacks rigorous validation, show weak alignment with linguistic features and personality traits, and fail to adapt to dynamic language environments such as social media. This study presents the construction and empirical validation of a personality lexicon derived from established psychological scales, dictionaries, and literature. Validation using real-world participant data yielded high hit rates across all Big Five dimensions (all > 0.70; mean = 0.787) and their 30 corresponding facets (all > 0.60; mean = 0.768). This lexicon provides a robust foundation for advancing computational personality assessment and supports applications in personalized NLP, large language models, and mental health prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.