ArticleScientific reports2026
Virtual reality to enhance risk management and safety in electrical substations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In high-risk environments, such as electrical substations, operation and maintenance are complex and dangerous tasks, which is reflected in the high occupational accident rate in the energy sector. The need to improve worker training to reduce accidents is critical, specially where human error or equipment failure can result in injury to workers or the public. his case study evaluates the effectiveness of immersive virtual reality (VR) versus traditional training methods used for electrical substation workers that must work in high electrical risk environments. The trial is developed in three phases within the context of the operational framework for an infrastructure and energy company in Spain. In the first phase, both training approaches are compared by means of theoretical tests complemented by immersive simulations, which are tested in a real project environment. In the second, the knowledge obtained in the real project environment is evaluated, and in the third, participants are subjected to an emergency simulation in a controlled environment to measure their response capacity. The results suggest that the incorporation of VR training significantly improves knowledge retention, risk identification and decision making under pressure. Therefore, this research confirms the value of VR simulation as an effective training tool in high-risk environments, providing a safe and practical experience that reduces the incidence of occupational accidents in electrical substations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.