Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41775717›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A large-scale dataset of choice and response-time data in intertemporal choice.

Hannah Pongratz, Martin Schoemann

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hannah Pongratz *Department of Psychology, University of Mannheim, 68131, Mannheim, Germany. hannah.pongratz@uni-mannheim.de.
Martin Schoemann *Department of Psychology, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01062, Dresden, Germany. martin.schoemann@tu-dresden.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2531-4175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of intertemporal choices (ITC) plays a vital role in psychological and behavioral economics research. Models of intertemporal choice (ITC) have traditionally focused on choices. A growing interest in the underlying cognitive processes has initiated the development of process models. Process models require process data, and yet ITC research has largely overlooked even the simplest process data - response times (RTs). We present a large-scale dataset of choices and response times from 100 ITC studies with 11,852 subjects and 1,172,644 trials. In addition to behavioral data, we collected various methodological and sample information (e.g., task procedure, incentivization). The objective of the large-scale dataset is to facilitate the development of more nuanced and accurate theories of ITC. The associated ITC Database is open to ongoing submissions and is projected to expand continuously.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorReaction TimeHumans

Identifiers

PMID41775717
PMCPMC12960822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.